Original Post
Gary: Sorry about the confusion with the points. The points from the lecture was meant to be 3 myths.. not 3 facts. I originally submitted my post e-mail to the MBA office as “Debunking the Top 3 IP Myths in China”, but somehow, it got converted into the vague title of “IP in China”. […]

continue reading.....

Original Post
IP remains one of the growing concerns as brands move their productions and/or operations to China. With all the counterfeiting of products on the market, one can only reason that we need to keep our products in the US in order to protect them from Chinese pirates. But are you really safe? Catherine Sun, […]

continue reading.....

Original Post
Gary: As you correctly said, IP law is not meant to benefit foreigners, necessarily, but really to benefit itself. But I would respectfully disagree with you that IP is not enforceable in China. Numerous law resources are available on the internet through Google that shows IP to be enforceable by judicial and administrative means. […]

continue reading.....

Original Post
Impressive! The turnaround time on the Motorola lawsuit was quick (within the same year of 2007)! This is an example of the judicial proceedings route to IP enforcement. Now, let’s see if Guangzhou Weierwei Electronic Science and Technology Company plays nice and doesn’t sell the IP to tech pirates or feign compliance. Compliance […]

continue reading.....

Original Post
What an interesting discussion. I was reading Prof. Carr’s comment, particularly about the article "Are We Innovative Yet? The China Challenge". I found the comments from the author of the article to be somewhat true and somewhat not. First, a comment about Chinese education. It’s true that Chinese are forced to study… and study […]

continue reading.....